Earth/matriX The Legend of the Four Suns
by
Charles William Johnson
Dr. Miguel León Portilla
THE LEGEND OF THE FOUR SUNSby
|
The duration in time of each sun varies according to the cited source.
Verbal legend or oral history has the periods as follows
:
1st Sun: nahui ocelotl lasted 676 years; |
2nd Sun: nahui ehecatl lasted 364 years; |
3rd Sun: nahui quiahuitl lasted 312 years; and |
4th Sun: nahui atl lasted 676 years. |
The fifth sun is said to be still in existence.
However, if one looks at some of the codices then the ages of each sun varies. The Chimalpopoca Codex places the same ages upon each of the first three suns, but states that the fourth sun lasted 728 years. In that case the total for the four suns would be 2080 years, while oral tradition would have the total at 2028 years.
The Codex of the Vatican 3738 would place the ages of each period or
sun at much longer intervals:
1st Sun: | matlactli atl lasted 4008 years; |
2nd Sun: | ehecatl lasted 410 years; |
3rd Sun: | tlequiyahuillo lasted 4081 years;and |
4th Sun: | tzontlilic lasted 5042 years according to
the narrator, while the codex itself shows 5026 years. |
Such differences in the duration of each sun becomes quite intriguing
as we revise the logic of the numbers. In this essay, we shall attempt
to discern the possible meaning behind the numbers, in order to explore
their internal logic. It seems difficult to understand how such enormous
differences in the ages of the suns could have come about.
Since the historical record shows such obvious discrepancies, let us then examine the numbers in and of themselves, in relation to the ancient reckoning systems. The nature of the numbers, in some cases being multiples of the 52-year cycle, would appear to reflect knowledge within astronomy. However, the patterns established by the numbers, periods of equal or almost equal duration, would suggest that these numbers were chosen, and do not reflect the spontaneous character of history.
The question arises that if they are numbers that were consciously chosen, then why were they chosen. It would appear that the numbers were chosen to communicate specific ideas. In order to discern these ideas, we must analyze the nature of the numbers themselves.
Earth/matriX
Science in Ancient Artwork Nº.15
The Legend of the Four Suns
21 May 1995
©1995-2012 Copyrighted by Charles William Johnson.
All Rights Reserved
Earth/matriX,
USA
Reproduction prohibited without written consent of the author.
The Aztec Calendar: Math and Design
THE AZTEC CALENDAR: In the book The Aztec Calendar: Math and Design, Charles William
Johnson examines the possible relationships between mathematics and geometry.
The historically significant numbers may reflect progressions which in
turn may be translated into geometrical figures and designs. No one knows
for certain how the Aztec Calendar may have been read or interpreted.
Its simbolic design is striking and has intrigued scholars for centuries.
The Aztec Calendar: Math and Design explores the stone's elements and
rings in relation to their spatial divisions in an attempt to discern
a possible method of computation, using the historically significant numbers
of the ancient reckoning system. The book promotes the existence of specific
mathematical posits that the geometrical spatial division of the calendar's
elements appear to obey.
Purchase in Amazon. |
ISBN 1-58616-182-2 Tape Bound 8" x 11 " |
Home | Books | All Essays | Author |