Tweet

Read how the implicit formula designed into Einstein's famous equation predetermines the numerical results obtained are generally confusing or redundant. The confusion is clarified when using Planck mass and Planck energy in the equation. Below is a brief excerpt of this essay, but it is best to read the entire line of reasoning behind the distinction of Einstein's formula and Einstein's equation. They are in fact two different aspects of the same numerical values. The former has to due with a rigidity in the design of the E-term, energy, and the latter emphasizes the behavior of the numerical values in the relation of equivalency.

The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299,792,458 meters/second. The square of 299,792,458 produces a numerical value that does not exist in any material sense of matter-energy. It is just a "big number" as some scientists hold, while others identify that number as only a "mathematical tool". Johnson goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein's famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of the logic behind Einstein's formula is explored through basic math, the summation of power's in the terms of the equation. This study also examines the powers of c (the measured speed of light in a vacuum) as contained in symbolic formulae of the Planck constants for Planck Mass and Planck Energy .The Planck constants are considered in light of c-square and other higher values for the exponents of mass and energy.