and Science Today The Maya Long Count:


The numbers related to the multiples of the 345 right triangle appear to reflect the number sets of the maya long count and the constant numbers of the 1,4,8,16,32,64,128,256, etc. progression. Furthermore, it would also appear that when the multiples of the 345 right triangle undergo relationships of equivalency to the power of three, there appears to exist a modification or extension of the Pythagorean Theorem. Also, these same computations would appear to suggest a different way of conceptualizing Fermat's Last Theorem. The fact that the numbers resulting from the charts devised by the author around the 345 right triangle seem to be directly related to the maya positional level numbers/fractals would suggest a possible manner of computation. The 345 right triangle may have served as the basis for devising and adopting the multiples of the maya long count numbers/fractal, as they both appear to enjoy the same kind of logic in the interplay of numbers; especially, the two number sets based on the 36c and the 64c numbers/fractals. The 36 x 64 combination produces the 2304 maya alautun number/fractal. Also, the addition of the two numbers equals 100 (36 + 64), which together form the twofold multiple of the 345 right triangle to the power of two: 6810 to the power of two yields the 3664100 relation, which also serves as the logic of numbers of the maya long count. 
Table of Contents THE MAYA LONG COUNT:

Introduction
The 345 right triangle is extremely significant for understanding possibly the origin of the maya long count numbers/fractals: 18,36,72,144,288,576,1152,2304,4608,9216, etc. The numerical system is obviously based on the doubling/halving of the integers as we have been discussing and illustrating in the Earth/matriX series of essays. We have also seen how the maya long count numbers/fractals appear in many different unsuspecting environments, such as in the distance that the sun travels in a specific 20day period of time (Earth/matriX No. 36). The also occur sporadically in minimax polynomials of the Fibonacci numbers (Horadam). We have also shown how they repeat themselves throughout the numbers related to the right triangle measurements and related powers.
Now, let us examine more closely alternative ways of conceptualizing the 345 right triangle; its different multiples and related powers of 2 and 3, the square and the cube of the 345 right triangle. The numbers that become evident from this mediatio/duplatio procedure would appear to suggest an extension of the Pythagorean theorem and a possible emendation to Fermat's conjecture or the last theorem.
Multiples of the 345 Right Triangle
In the following chart we have simply offered multiples of the 345 right triangle in a series as indicated by the number of times multiplied in each column.
1x  2x  4x  8x  16x  ...  

1x  3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  ... 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  ...  
3x  9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240  ... 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600  ...  
4x  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  ... 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  ...  
5x  15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400  ... 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000  ...  
6x  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480  ... 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400  ...  
7x  21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560  ... 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600  ...  
8x  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640  ... 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600  ...  
9x  27  36  45  54  72  90  18  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720  ... 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400  ...  
...  ...  ...  ...  ...  ...  ... 
The horizontal reading of the multiples regards the constant number series of 1, 2 , 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512..., which we have discussed earlier as an essential multiple series of the maya long count in relation to the positional level numbers/fractals of the maya long count itself: 9, 18, 36, 72, 144, 288, 576, 1152, 2304... The vertical reading of the previous chart reflects simply the 345 right triangle in a simple progression of unit multiples with an increment of one (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9...). The different numerical combinations that derive from this procedure, as we shall examine herein, would seem to substantiate further the possibility that such a computational procedure may have been at the basis of the maya long count system, and the use of the 345 right triangle in maya artwork as some authors have also pointed out in their analyses (Harleston).
3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400 
9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600 
12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400 
15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000 
18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400 
21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600 
24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600 
27  36  45  54  72  90  108  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400 
Once we have obtained different series of numbers for multiples of the 345 right triangle, it is then possible to apply the Pythagorean Theorem and obtain the squares of the different numbers.
3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400 
9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600 
12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400 
15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000 
18  24  30  36  48  60  2  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400 
21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600 
24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600 
27  36  45  54  72  90  108  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400 
From these two sets of numbers (the multiples of the 345 right triangle and their squares), the maya long count numbers/fractals become obvious in most cases as we have pointed out in the following chart. It is only with respect to the two series beginning with 81 and 324 that they are not obvious; but one only has to divide the integers of those series by the numbers 36 or those of the maya long count system itself (18,36,72,144, etc.) in order to see them make their appearance.
3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400 
9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600 
12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400 
15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000 
18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400 
21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600 
24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600 
27  36  45  54  72  90  108  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400 
One should also note that the 441 and 729 series of numbers/fractals are also divisible by 36, but this does not produce the maya long count numbers/fractals. Possibly one of the most significant points is to note that the multiples derived from the multiplication of 7 (7x), do not reflect the maya long count fractals at any set of terms (either as multiples or as squares).
3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400 
9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600 
12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400 
15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000 
18  24  30  36  48  60  2  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400 
21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600 
24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600 
27  36  45  54  72  90  108  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400 
In order to illustrate the dynamics of the chart and the manner in which the multiples behave, let us take an example of numbers (a combination of the 345 triangle) as identified by Hugh Harleston in a structure in Urumchi, China. The reader is encouraged to read Mr. Harleston's work which treats the Urumchi structure in relation to the pyramid of Khufu and La pirámide del sol of Teotihuacan, Mexico. The numbers that Mr. Harleston offers for the Urumchi structure are: 216288360.
As we observe the chart offered here, these numbers appear within a more specific context, then simply as multiples of a 345 right triangle. The numbers obviously reflect the maya long count fractals (as Harleston himself has pointed out). But, now we may observe the different manners by which one may obtain these numbers within the different series of multiples themselves.
3  4  5  6  8  10  12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80 
9 + 16 = 25  36 + 64 = 100  144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400 
9  12  15  18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240 
81 + 144 = 225  324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36854 = 57600 
12  16  20  24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320 
144 + 256 = 400  576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 5400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400 
15  20  25  30  40  50  60  80  100  120  160  200  240  320  400 
225 + 400 = 625  900 + 1600 = 2500  3600 + 6400 = 10000  14400 + 25600 = 40000  57600 + 102400 = 160000 
18  24  30  36  48  60  72  96  120  144  192  240  288  384 480 
324 + 576 = 900  1296 + 2304 = 3600  5184 + 9216 = 14400  20736 + 36864 = 57600  82944 + 147456 = 230400 
21  28  35  42  56  70  84  112  140  168  224  280  336  448  560 
441 + 784 = 1225  1764 + 3136 = 4900  7056 + 12544 = 19600  28224 + 50176 = 78400  112896 + 200704 = 313600 
24  32  40  48  64  80  96  128  160  192  256  320  384  512  640 
576 + 1024 = 1600  2304 + 4096 = 6400  9216 + 16384 = 25600  36864 + 65536 = 102400  147456 + 262144 = 409600 
27  36  45  54  72  90  108  144  180  216  288  360  432  576  720 
729 + 1296 = 2025  2915 + 5184 = 8100  11664 + 20736 = 32400  46656 + 82944 = 129600  186624 + 331776 = 518400 
Furthermore, one may observe how to visualize an interchange of multiples which makes the system of computation extremely dynamic from different measurements of a 345 right triangle.
It is impossible to even begin to offer computations that might appear to be meaningful for ancient reckoning systems in ancient China, Egypt, or Mesoamerica. But, the significant point is that the numbers related to these numbers easily refer to such systems of ancient reckoning. The number/fractal 1296000 has been cited as significant for ancient Egypt. The number 360c obviously refers to the ancient calendar daycount both in ancient Egypt and Mesoamerica. While the integer 72 has been significant in obtaining the Platonic Year: 72 x 360 = 25920. Too many combinations of related numbers become far too obvious to treat them at this juncture. Consider a few other examples:
1366560  mayacompanion number 
466560  Urumchi fractal derivative 
900000  difference (a constant fractal of the maya system) 
46656 / 36 = 1296 fractal of ancient Egypt 
82944 / 36 = 2304 alautun (maya) 
Obviously, the system reflects a series of multiples, but it becomes evermore apparent that the system reflects the maya long count numbers/fractals precisely.
Multiples of the 345 Right Triangle and the Power of Three
Now, let us carry the numbers/fractals of the 345 right triangle to the power of three in order to observe their behaviour. It is here that there would seem to be an apparent extension of the Pythagorean theorem (x^{2} + y^{2} = z^{2}) to involve the equation of the cube of the measurements of the 345 right triangle which derives from the series of multiples that we have chosen for the chart: w^{3} + x^{3} + y^{3} = z^{3}.
This particular equation, derived from the 345 right triangle specifically, would also suggest the idea that Fermat's conjecture or the last theorem, in fact, may never have been even formulated had this equation been known at the time. For, if it is true that w^{3} + x^{3} + y^{3} = z^{3}, then it would be quite apparent that a particular case of Fermat's Last Theorem, such as, x^{3} + y^{3} = z^{3} would represent an obvious impossibility. That could have been one line of reasoning for disregarding Fermat's Last Theorem as Frederich Gauss once commented.
We have presented the series of the 345 right triangle numbers alongside a graph for no other reason than to offer a visualization of the procedure. Since the numbers/fractals are proportional, the actual right triangle may be any given size; there is no apparent relationship between the number series and the graphlike figures. The idea is to simply show how one right triangle leads into another as of the first integer os each one.
The sum of the cube of the integers of the 345 right triangle equals the cube of the initial integer's cube of the following right triangle of the series: for example,
345  
3^{3} + 4^{3} + 5^{3}  equals 6^{3} 
6^{3} being the initial integer of the following right triangle on the progression of multiples of the 345 right triangle:
3^{3} + 4^{3} + 5^{3} = 6^{3}  
6^{3} + 8^{3} + 10^{3} =12^{3} 
This procedure remains for the entire series of multiples of the 345 right triangle to infinity; in other words, an unending progression of 345 right triangles and their multiples/powers of there.
The most significant point possibly is that the numbers of this particular progression to the power of 3 do not reflect the maya long count numbers as such, but reflect rather constants that may be used to obtain the maya long count numbers:
256  x  36  =  9216  maya fractal 
320  x  36  =  11520  maya fractal 
etc. 
Observe the numbers derived then from the cube of the numbers of the multiples
of the 345 right triangle in their progression:
The Cube of the 345 Right Triangle
Observations
From the numbers derived as of the multiples of the 345 right triangle, it becomes apparent that the maya long count positional level numbers/fractals may have been created as of a similar system of computation. The fact that this particular set of numbers occurs in ancient artwork around the world may also be a reason for a common mathematical heritage.
The behaviour of the numbers/fractals would seem to suggest a possible extension of the Pythagorean Theorem to include the cube of the integers related to the 345 right triangle and its multiples as illustrated in the various charts presented herein.
It may be further comprehensible how to evaluate Fermat's conjecture regarding the cube of certain numbers and their powers. Obviously Fermat was correct in surmising that it was impossible to find a relation of equivalency within the selfimposed terms of his conjecture. However, the reasons may be quite distinct from the ones that are suggested by his conjecture. The geometry of the 345 right triangle may be more helpful in understanding the reasoning behind the behaviour of whole numbers to the power of three.
For, it one understands that a progression of 345 right triangles and their multiples in whole numbers (which may be even fractals or fractions with the concept of a floating decimal place, which appears to have been the case in ancient reckoning systems), follows the equation w^{3} + x^{3} + y^{3} = z^{3}, then one may comprehend this as an extension of the behaviour of the right triangle according to the Pythagorean Theorem (for the power of 2), and as a possible emendation to Fermat's conjecture regarding a possible (actually impossible) relation of equivalency of x^{n} + y^{n} = z^{n}, specifically in the case of the power of three. If the maya understood the obvious concept of geometric progression of numbers implied in the equation cited to the third power for 345 right triangle, then they possibly would not have even entertained the idea forwarded by Fermat. Furthermore, they possibly understood the numerical possibility of
x^{3} + y^{3} = z^{2}  , in other words, 
1^{3} + 2^{3} = 3^{2}  
1 + 8 = 9  
9 = 9 
which would have probably discouraged them from considering again Fermat's conjecture given the knowledge suggested in the ancient reckoning system based on multiples of number sets of 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc., and 9, 18, 36, 72, 144, etc. of the maya long count system.
The progression of numbers as reflected in the multiples/powers of the 345 right triangle would appear to be relevant to such visual expressions in the ancient artwork as the graphlike figures and designs of the ancient fretwork (grecas), especially among the cultures of Mesoamerica, such as the maya. It could be understood how the progression of triangles may have served as a basis for such designs of repeat, unending patterns as well.
©19962016 Copyrighted by Charles
W. Johnson. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction prohibited without written consent of the author.
email: johnson@earthmatrix.com
Earth/matriX
Science in Ancient Artwork Nº.56
THE MAYA LONG COUNT: AN EXTENSION OF THE PYTHAGOREAN
THEOREM
AND AN EMENDATION TO FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM
11 May 1996
19962016 Copyrighted by Charles W. Johnson. All
Rights Reserved.
Reproduction prohibited without written consent of the author.
Earth/matriX,
P.O. Box 231126 New Orleans, LA 701831126;
Home  Books  Forum  Reviews  All essays  Author 