earthmatrix: science in ancient artwork and sicence today
Science in Ancient Artwork and Science Today
The Theoretical Interpretation of Spacetime/motion

Dedicated to the preservation of human knowledge in the arts and sciences, and to the advancement of human survival and to that of our planet in a world threatened by our own development.

presentation
books
All Essay
Forum
Limks
Author
Information

Charles William Johnson and Jorge Luna Martínez are the sole representatives
and legal agents of this website and its content, www.earthmatrix.com

Subject the earthmatrix
 
The Formula in Einstein's Equation
 
 New Proposal to Present the Human Karyotype
 
The Continental Symmetry
 
The Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants


Collections of Essays and Extracts

The Continental Drift, Plate Tectonics
and Sea-Floor Spreading: A Critical Commentary
Cosmogeography

Science Today


Finding themes on the site !
Loading

Einstein’s Formula:
A Sleight of Hand

by Charles William Johnson

In basic math exponents are added.

x1   times   y2   =   z3

In Einstein’s famous formula two exponents are not given; they are hidden

E = m c2

Only the term c, the speed of light in a vacuum, has its exponent made explicit: c-square. The terms of E (energy) and m (mass) do not have their exponents given. Yet, in math, we know the rule is to add up the exponents in such equations.

One might think that the exponent of E is one   (E1) and that the exponent of m is one also (m1). But, according to the basic rules of mathematics, this is impossible because exponents are added in equations of equivalency based on multiplication of terms.

E1   =  m1  c2

Addition of exponents (^): ^1 = ^1 + ^2 (trivially incorrect)

According to the rules of math, the formula forwarded by over a century ago appears to imply:

E1   =  m1  c2

However, according to mathematical procedure this should be:

E3   =  m1  c2

Therefore, the term for mass (m) might be thought to have the first power ( m1 ). And, since c-square is given then E in relation to m1c2 would have to be E3 ---even though E is shown to have a power of one (E1) according to the formula. The expression E3 = m1 c2, not shown, obtains irrespective of whether the terms in the formula are the same or distinct as illustrated in the equation.

One could imagine the three different terms of the formula in different equivalencies as of the same terms in three different ways, according to the powers implicit in the formula:

E1 = E1 E2
m1 = m1 m2
c1 = c1 c2

It is this last expression that has caught our eye for the past few years in our research. The reason the last expression, c1 = c1 c2 draws so much attention is due to the numerical values given in the science literature today for Planck Energy and Planck Mass. These values are commonly cited as:

Planck Energy = 1.9560 fractal*
Planck Mass = 2.17645 fractal *
c-square = 8.987551787 fractal*

Planck Energy = Planck Mass times Speed of Light in a vacuum

1.9560 = 2.17645 x 8.987551787
(significant fractal numbers)

These values are supposedly to be interpreted implicitly as the powers for E and m are never given in the formula's presentation anywhere in the science literature.:

E1   =  m1  c2

 

The obvious manipulation of the powers of the terms E and m during the existence of Einstein's supposed formula is now made obvious. Throughout the science literature for over one hundred years this sleight of hand in math has been overlooked, accepted as a given tenet of the formula.

Supposedly, the Planck values when entered into the terms of the equation tell us something about the equivalency of mass | Energy. This may not be the case, however; it may be a case of a mistaken math procedure.

The fractal numerical values of the cited Planck constants suggest and/or express equivalencies in multiples/powers of the speed of light.

Planck Energy equals Planck mass times c-square:

19560.78711 equals 2176.431087 times
8.987551787

These numerical values are fractal expressions of the speed of light in a vacuum; respectively.

c9   equals   c7   times   c2

When c is expressed as a significant value in scientific notation, as 2.99792458, the following obtains for the significant values of higher exponents, its multiples:

c1  =  2.99792458
c2  =   8.987551787
c3  =   26.94400242
c4  =   80.77608713
c5  =   242.1606171
c6  =   725.9792663
c7 =  2176.431087 (Planck mass constant)
c8   =   6524.776252
c9 = 19560.78711 (Planck energy constant)

next: document pdf

    THE FUNDAMENTAL PHIYSICAL CONSTANTS

  1. The Planck Constants Represent Powers of the Speed of Light in vacuo. ( version PDF)
  2. The Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants.
  3. My Hunch about Quarks and Their Numerical Values
  4. Planck Units of Mass, Momentum and Energy c7, c8 , c9
  5. E = mc2  is simply c9 =  c7c2
  6. Fundamental Physical Constants Notes: Fractal Multiples and Einstein's Equation
  7. Einstein's Formula: A Special Case:
    The E = mc2 equation is really E3 = m1c2..
  8. Einstein's Formula Stands for Powers of Speed of Light, Not the Conversion of Mass|Energy:
    (c9 = c7 c2 the Basis of E = mc2)
  9. Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion (c9 = c7 c2 the Basis of E = mc2)
  10. Einstein's Formula and Variations of Redundancies
  11. The Formula in Einstein's Equation
  12. Einstein’s Formula: A Sleight of Hand
  13. Redefining the Kilogram as of Planck’s Constant: A Critical Commentary.
  14. Table of Selected Fundamental Physical Constants Derive ~ c9 Fractal Numerical Value ~ 1.95607871
  15. Respectively, Powers of the Speed of a Light Photon.
  16. The Earth/matriX Table of Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants.
  17. The Planck Constants Represent Powers of the Speed of Light in vacuo

THE PHYSICS CHALLENGE
 
EINSTEIN'S FORMULA: MASS CONFUSION
 
ebook Kindle
The physics paradigm today is based mainly upon the concept of c-square, the squaring of the speed of light in a vacuum. Numerous fundamental physical and chemical constants provided in the physics literature [CODATA] reflect numerical values based upon powers of c, the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined to represent the upper limit of movement of mass|energy by physicists.
 
The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299792458 meters/second. The square of that number produces a numerical value that does not exist in any form of matter-energy. The c-square actually represents a number that corresponds to a near massless event: a light photon. The author goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein’s famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of Einstein’s formula is explored through basic math, the summation of powers in the equation’s terms.

Proposal to Include Selected Constants on the Complete Listing
of the Fundamental Physical Constants by NIST

Proposal to Include Selected Constants on the  Complete Listing of the Fundamental Physical Constants by NIST
©2014 Copyrighted by Charles William Johnson. All rights reserved. View the Complete NIST List

Reverse Engineering the Planck Constants
An Analysis of the Planck implied mass differences:
3.387 and 3.487


The Big Bang Theory Debunked by Its Own Reasoning:
As Illustrated in the Popular Scientific Diagrams of the Big Bang
The Big Bang Theory Debunked by Its Own Reasoning
The scientific diagram of the Big Bang theory of the creation of the Universe reflect a purpose and intent of representing exactly what is purportedly to have existed. The critical evaluation of these diagrams and the theory they supposedly portray need to be questioned in a like manner of exactitude.
The question is whether the spacetime/motion coordinates presented in the diagrams are possible according to what we know about matter-energy as forms of spacetime.
Further, the theory of the Big bang does not account for the apparent appearance or creation of matter in the Cosmos, apparently from nothing.
The Big Bang theory would presuppose the idea that whatever matter-energy was created at the moment of the Big Bang is what exists now and forever.
Its theoretical limitation is the restrictive interpretation of the transformation of matter-energy where it apparently appears to be created or re-created in some parts of the Universe.... more

Today recommend the articles by Charles Johnson

p A Proposal for Reordering and Making Additions to the Complete List of Fundamental Physical and Chemical Constants Published by NIST

pThe Idea of "Uncertainty" in the Fundamental Physical Constants: Relational Computations without Physical Bases

p Emission Spectral Lines for the Elements: An Earth/matriX Ordering - Two Views

p The Physical Atomic Weight Scale: A Unit 1.0 Scale Based on Fluorine 19

p A New Special Right Triangle: 15° · 75° · 90°: The Solar System's 60-Degree Angle of Inclination to the Galactic Plane

p A Commentary on the International Astronomical Union's Definition of a Planet.

p A Spacetime/Motion:Analysis of Relativity Theory and The Speed of Light in a Vacuum (Draft)


p The ElectroMagnetic Particle-Wave Spectrum: Different Levels of Velocities
p Hypothetical Superluminal Velocities of Matter-Energy and the Visble Electromagnetic Particle-Wave Spectrum
p The Speed of Light in a Vacuum is Notthe Maximum Speed of Matter-Energy
p Electromagnetic Particle-Waves Always Travel Faster than the Defined Speed of Light in a Vacuum

The Reciprocal of Light: Gravity
The Reciprocal of Gravity: Light
1/C gif2005-2 ½G and 1/G gif2005/gifd-2/equiva.gif ½C

Reciprocal of light
Reciprocity of light and Gravity

COMPARISON OF DISPERSION MEASURES (DMs) OF FAST RADIO BURSTS (FRBs) TO ANCIENT NUMBER COUNTS
Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) Dispersion Measures (DMs)


The New Periodic Table: The Schemata of the Elements
click

The Electronic Schemata of the Elements

New Table Periodic: Schema electronic

The Iron Peak on Three Different
Schemata of the ElementTable elements of the Fusion and Fission




The Solar System: Related Circumferences of the Sun, Planets and Moons.
(Ganymede, the Moon and Calisto)

The Sun|Earth|Moon Relation:
Polar/Mean/Equatorial Diameters and Circumferences

The Solar System: Related Circumferences of the Sun, Planets and Moons
The Sun|Earth|Moon Relation: Polar/Mean/Equatorial Diameters and Circumferences



The Sun, the Earth, the Moon and Pi The Solar System and Pluto: Patterns and Equivalencies of Planetary Diameters
The circumference of the Moon times the radius of the Earth equals a fractal multiple of the radius of the Sun
The Solar System and Pluto: Patterns and Equivalencies of Planetary Diameters



Debunking the Theory of Continental Drift
Earth´s Life Cycles Contradict the Supercontinent Cycle
(Pangaea - Pangaea Ultima)

(The Earth´s Reproductive Life Cycles of Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen and
Water Deny the Theory of Continental Drift).
click pdf

 


Egyptian hieroglyphs,
Chinese characters and Maya glyphs

Read comparisons of the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, Chinese characters and Maya glyphs that are related in sound, meaning and writing for selected word-concepts. The evident linguistic correspondence of these three languages suggests early contact or a shared ancient history amongst themselves.

flint character chinese, maya, copto

Night AEH Chinese alone Compared

China Oracle Tortoise Shell Reading:
A Structural Non-Decipherment Analysis

distinct structural ordering of the Chinese glyph characters
This essay presents a structural analysis of the lines, glyphs, characters, graphemes etched on an ancient Chinese tortoise shell.
The glyph characters have been cited as readings from heating the tortoise shells and interpreting the resulting cracks and lines appearing in the tortoise shell.
A distinct structural ordering of the Chinese glyph characters is presented that questions the interpretation of the glyph characters in popular scholarship. more--- click


Maya Glyphs and Chinese Characters:
A Comparative Reading

Red in maya Glifo
Red in Chinese characters
The Maya and Chinese writing systems are generally accepted as representing two totally distinct and unrelated systems. Yet, it becomes obvious that both share similar features in the structural and spatial presentation of the elements within a specific glyph or character. The comparisons made herein demonstrate this point . . . . . . more

The incredible fact is that the boiling point of water, mass defect, Planck implied energy and, the elementary charge are near fractal multiples of one another.
(Table of Selected Fundamental Physical and Chemical Constants with Corresponding Ratio of 0.366 - 1.366+  Fractal Values) CLICK1366560 energy


A Comment on the Land Mass on Earth and the Superficiality of Continental Drift Theory

The Land Mass on Earth [Composition, Form and Motion] is determined by the following factors and their interplay, together with innumerable other considerations that have been discussed in my book, Eventpoint Cosmogeography. click

1) The Equator Fixed Rotation
2) The Ecliptic Plane [Earth|Sun relation]
3) Precession motion
4) Nutation
6) Gravity Pull-to-Center: Earth
7) Inner-Core Levels
8) Gravity Pull-to-Moon
9) Gravity Pull-to-Sun [closest star]
10) Gravity Pull-to-Solar System
11) Gravity Pull-to-Stars|Galaxy
12) Gravity Pull-to-Great Attractor
13) Gravity Pull-to-Other Galaxies
[resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion] [resulting motion]

The cited aspects and forces|relationships of matter-energy shape the land mass on Earth.... click


A New Special Right Triangle: 15° · 75° · 90°
The Solar System's 60-Degree Angle of
Inclination to the Galactic Plane


The Solar System’s 60-Degree Angle of Inclination to the Galactic Plane

Sheryl Hartzheim

SHERYL ELIZABETH HARTZHEIM
In loving memory

"I'd like the memory of me
to be a happy one.
I'd like to have an afterglow
of smiles when life is done.
I'd like to leave an echo
whispering softly down the ways
of happy times and laughing times
and bright and sunny days.
I'd like the tears of those who grieve,
to dry before the sun,
of happy memories that I leave
when life is done." -Unknown

more...


Different Planets as Unit 1.0:
Mass, Radii, Density Other Categories

Different Planets as Unit 1.0: Mass, Radii, Density and Other Categories. In this presentation of slides, we examine the relationships of the planets as of specific characteristics with different planets being assigned unit 1.0 for diferent data.
Comparisons based on different planets being set at unit 1.0 allow us to identify different relational aspects among the planets, and progressions in the numerical values otherwise overlooked.
The traditional analysis of maintaining Earth the 3rd planets in the solar system as unit 1.0 denies patterns from appearing when other planets are assigned unit 1.0 for comparison. Without this perspective, it is difficult to teach young astronomers the rich analytical possibility of this system. The scienctific literature conventionally presents the Earth as unit 1.0 to its own detriment. ..more

Unit astronimical planets

Superluminal Velocities Observed in Quasars
Baseline Palanque-Piedras Negras

The Geometry of Ancient Sites in Middle America

Observations for the placement and patterns of Middle America archaeological sites.

1.- On a map, the ancient sites appear to be mere points, but in reality they are large geographical spaces, with wide-reaching coordinates.
2.- Therefore, the relationship among ancient sites represents corridors of spaces, rather than simple lines.
3.- There exist many different baseline distances among the various ancient sites, which suggest corridors of sacred spaces.
4.- Different cultures appear to have employed similar baseline distances for the placement of their ancient sites, with different cultures interconnected as of the same-similar baseline distances.
5.- Some placements of ancient sites appear to reflect abstracted geometric designs, while others reveal relationships of varying meanings.
6.- The patterns derived from the different baseline distances suggest the possibility of finding archaeological sites yet to be discovered along the sacred corridors. ... more



The Beal Conjecture: Ax + By = Cz

A Proof and Counterexamples
[A
x + By = zC]

The conjecture Ax + By = Cz made by Mr. Andrew Beal is concerned with the common prime factor for positive integers and their exponents.

"If ,ax + by = cz , where A,B,C, x, y and z, are positive integers x, y and z are all greater than 2, then A, B and C must have a common prime factor." [Mauldin, 1997] This represents the original wording of the Beal Conjecture.

The Beal Conjecture requires positive integers in the terms [A, B, C] and exponents [x, y, z] of the equation (the latter whose value must be greater than 2). The products of the terms must reflect the selfsame multiplication of the terms in whole numbers or positive integers. Obviously, no fractional expressions are to appear in any of the three terms or three exponents of the equation. And, the most significant part of the conjecture affirms the necessity that the terms share a common prime divisor. Or, to the contrary, present counterexamples.

  • A Submission to the Beal Conjecture Competition Last-Digit Terminations and the Beal Conjecture: An Explanation
  • The Beal Conjecture: Submission Number Two
  • The Beal Conjecture: Ax + By = Cz A Proof and Counterexamples [Ax + By = zC]
  • The Beal Conjecture and the Limitations of Algebraic Notation
  • In our view, the concept of a counterexample stipulated by the Beal Conjecture is simply impossible by definition. An equation with co-prime terms cannot have positive integer terms and exponents, as stipulated, given the very definition of primes and co-primes, and their multiples. If a co-prime pair of terms (divisible only by the greater common denominator of 1) were to exist, then that would represent a counterexample in our view. Now, the fact that the conjecture may wish to see a counterexample with all exponents as whole numbers (as well as the terms) is simply expecting something that cannot derive from co-primes and their relationship in the cited equation. We shall explain the reason for this as of the concept of selfsame addition of terms.

    The argument made in this essay is directed at the system of notation that we have inherited throughout history, based upon, in this case, the limiting method of selfsame multiplication of terms. In that sense, these observations go beyond the Beal Conjecture. The insight posed by Mr. Andrew Beal in his conjecture serves as encouragement for looking at old problems in a new light. We are simply attempting to peel back the first layer of algebraic notation in order to emphasize the relations occurring behind the symbolic language. And, in our mind, that is precisely what Mr. Beal has afforded in launching such a critical conjecture.

    ..... more


    The East Africa Rift Valley Means No More Continental Drift Theory Cosmogeography Analyzes and Illustrates
    How The Shape of the Continent of South America Reveals
    the Future Shape of Africa

    The East Africa Rift Valley Means No More Continental Drift Theory

    science in ancient artwork

    The Pointer: Aztec Calendar
    Aztec Calendar Aztec Calendar
    Pakal the Maya Astronaut
    Venus
    Pakal


    Image aztec calendar

    Huitzilipochtli:
    Hidden Images of the Aztec Calendar click

    Has our research been of value to you?
    Show you appreciation
     
  • Ancient Encoded Numbers:
    The Speed of Light
  • The Pythagorean Theorem:
    What's Real, What's Not
  • The Square Root of Ten 3.16227766 and
    Its Reciprocal .316227766
  • The Geodetic Foot: the 1296c Factor
  • Escape Velocity: Planetary Reckoning
  • The Astronomical Unit (AU):
    Mercury/Sun Distance
  • Ancient Phi and Its Extension.
    A study of the concept of phi as of the
    3-4-5 perfect right triangle.
  • The Great Pyramid of Giza and
    the 1.6.8.9 Triangle.

    View the profile design of the Great Pyramid of ancient Egypt based upon the Extension of the Pythagorean Theorem.
  • Ephemeris Time and Ancient Numbers.
    Earth's Year-Counts and ancient reckoning numbers in seconds and fractions [ugh!]
  • Extracts of the Schemata of the Elements.
    View over forty brief commentaries on the significance of the temperature scale and the square root of three.
  • 9 Baktuns on the Aztec Calendar

    the Legend of the Four Suns
    The Numbers of the Legend of the Four Suns
    on the Aztec Calendar - click -

    THE GOLDBACH CONJECTURE AND THE UNIVERSE OF PRIMES

    THE GOLDBACH CONJECTURE AND THE UNIVERSE OF PRIMES

    Book:THE GOLDBACH CONJECTURE AND THE UNIVERSE OF PRIMES

    The Goldbach Conjecture and the Universe of Primes examines the even-sum tables of the natural numbers and prime numbers in proving the conjecture. The explanation of the inner workings of the Goldbach conjecture are rendered into simple math. Knowing how to add is all that is required. Profusely illustrated with easy-to-read math tables explaining how the sum of primes perform in relation to the conjecture.

    The author examines the Goldbach Conjecture, a 262 year-old conjecture. It is impossible to prove the Goldbach Conjecture in the manner in which the theorists of mathematics have been demanding. Instead of a resolution based on algebra, an explanation of the Goldbach Conjecture based on the numbers is required. In fact, this may be a simpler task than imagined until now.

    Purchase and download this Earth/matriX eBook
    The Goldbach Conjecture and the Universe of Primes
    Author: Charles William Johnson
    Price $8.64 US
    Shop with Paypal

    linea
    Tweet
    linea
    [Presentation] [Books] [Forum] [Author] [All Essays]

    Charles William Johnson, e-mail: charlesjohnson@earthmatrix.com


    Earth/matriX: Science in Ancient Artwork Series ISSN-1526-3312
    © 1995 - 2023 Copyrighted by Charles William Johnson and Jorge Luna Martinez. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any from is prohibited. All of the content text, images, drawings, designs and material ideas on this web-site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, copied, or redistributed by any means or in any form.
    Contact the owners, Charles William Johnson and Jorge Luna Martinez
    .
    charlesjohnson@earthmatrix.com and kawil@earthmatrix.com
    for information on licensing and/or any other aspect pertaining
    to this web-site and the material contained herein.
    Charles William Johnson and Jorge Luna Martínez are the sole representatives
    and legal agents of this website and its content, www.earthmatrix.com