That particular fractal expression is suggestive of the value utilized for Ephemeris time, at 31556925.9747 seconds for January 1900. Another computation for ephemeris time involves:

366.25636042 sidereal days times 86164.091 seconds = 31558146.37

The average between the two values cited in today's scientific literature is as follows:

31556925.9747 + 31558146.37 = 63115072.34 / 2 = 31557536.17

Now, subtract today's average value from the fractal number derived from the two Maya numbers:

31557536.17 minus 31557059.04 = 477.13 negligible difference in seconds

Consider, from the ephemeris time fractal value derived from the two Maya companion numbers, one would obtain a value of 365.2437389 for the mean tropical year. It is shown by astronomers that the mean tropical year was 365.2423 SI days at about AD 200; where it is currently near 365.2422 SI days. One could project backwards to derive the time frame for the 365.2437 number.

31557059.04 / 86400 = 365.2437389

Again, to suggest that the two Maya companion numbers derive the fractal value employed for Ephemeris time out of happenstance stretches one's imagination. The ancient Maya were counting time cycles (days, years), and the fact that the numbers employed for their day-counts coincide nearly exactly to the Ephemeris values of today suggests the presence of scientific knowledge on their part.

Central Temperature of the Sun and the Great Pyramid

The side measurements of the Great Pyramid of Giza have been debated for centuries. The two most commonly accepted measurements refer to the baseline of the four sides of the Great Pyramid and its projected height measurement (given the fact that the pyramidion is missing). These measurements are generally cited as a baseline of 756 feet (or, precisely as 755.79 feet by the Egyptian government) and a projected height of 481.5 feet. I have examined these values and related variations in different essays. For now, within going into detail of those discussions, simply consider the following relationship. Divide the Great Pyramid's baseline by its height and the following obtains:

756 / 481.5 = 1.570093458

Many schools have pointed out the close relationship of the side and height measurements of the Great Pyramid to being pi-related. For example, simply double the previous expression:

1.570093458 x 2 = 3.140186916 pi-like expression

Variations of the side and height measurements would produce more/less exact approximations to the value of pi. But, what if the ancient Egyptians knew pi as exactly as we do today, then one could consider distinct possibilities in the two measurements cited.

Half of pi (3.141592654) is 1.570796327. Adjustments in the measurements would be thus:

755.79 / 1.570796327 = 481.1508578 projected height thereof

481.5 x 1.570796327 = 756.3384314

In this manner, it is unnecessary to employ the Pythagorean Theorem for the measurements of the Great Pyramid. One could simply divide twice the measurement of the short leg of the triangle (height) of the Great Pyramid by the measurement of its long leg, obtaining thus ½ pi. And/or, one could divide twice the long leg measurement of the triangle by its hypotenuse, also obtaining thereby ½ pi.

Without going into detail at this time, there is a divine proportion based on mathematical computations derived as of the value 1.572302755 which mediates the measurements of 755.79 for the baseline and 480.6898656 for the height of the Great Pyramid. These are the only values that derive the formulae based on the short leg (a), long leg (b) and hypotenuse (c) of a triangle, where a is half the baseline (377.895 feet) and b represents the height (480.6898656 feet) of the right triangle.

The values employed may vary with the constant, 1.572302755 remaining intact:

The Pythagorean Theorem is employ for comparison.

Now, limit the view to the theoretical moment when the Sun faces itself, as it revolves around the barycenter with the planet Jupiter. In this case, one must consider the distance relating to double the .068 figure, from the surface of the Sun to its own surface across the way.

The measurement of .136 of 696000 kilometers would be then 94656 kilometers. Once again, the fractal expression of 1.36 finds itself relevant to matter-energy, only now it lies at the very center of the solar system.

The entire diameter of the spatial area covered by the revolution of the Sun would be 4.126 or 2878656 kilometers.

Consider the 1366560c Maya companion number as of the 2878656 value.

2878656 minus 1366560 = 1512096

1512096 / 2 = 756096 (suggestive of the baseline of 756 feet of the Great Pyramid).

In a previous study that I have posted on the www.earthmatrix.com web-site, the exact measurements for the Great Pyramid are given then as: 755.7909764 times the square root of two = 1068.849849, measurements which refer to a particular triangular form that derives naturally from the formula for right-angle triangles. It is my suspicion that the exact measurement for the barycenter of the solar system probably reflects these particular measurements.

The Solar Matrix, the Earth Matrix and the Matrix of the Universe

The Sun and the Earth, along with all the planetary related bodies in our solar system, obviously share the same matrix. That is what the numbers show; the relations of matter-energy are thus perceived. The presence and relevancy of fractal values relating to 1.36 - 1.38 have been shown throughout the Earth/matrix essays to be relational to matter-energy in many different forms and manifestations. The examples are numerous and convince me of the significance of the historically significant numbers found in different cultures throughout the ancient world to the study of matter-energy and to that of spacetime/movement.

One example alone weighs heavily on my mind. The Great Cycle is said to contain 26000 years, as computed millennia ago. So, when we multiple 26000 years times l65.256 sidereal days, the value of 9496656 obtains. Subtract the 136656c companion number of the Maya from that value and one derives 9360000. That may look innocent enough, but the Maya Long Count period consists of 1872000 days; 936 doubles to 1872. The ancient Maya evidently knew much more than what scholars today are willing to concede. Set aside ancient reckoning for the moment and simply consider the values as of the physical and chemical constants offered today in the exact sciences.

To find a relationship of .136 fractal at the very center of the solar system, and then to observe the very existence of that same/similar relationship throughout specific manifestations of matter-energy suggests a direct relationship of space-time. One may continue to argue the point that the ancient reckoning numbers represent random coincidences with the physical and chemical constants. It is difficult to think otherwise, given the degree of development that the ancient societies appear to have attained. The fact, however, that the 1.36 | 1.38 values occur at so many different levels of matter-energy make such a denial difficult in terms of spacetime/movement.

The coincidence of numbers becomes all too obvious when we set them down in table form. Listed on the following table are some of the physical and chemical constants that have been brought out in the different Earth/matrix essays. Specific studies of these values may be viewed on the web-sites www.earthmatrix.com and www.theschemata.com.

Table of Matter-Energy Events and Corresponding Fractal Values

To the previous list, now, must be added the ratio of the Sun | Sun Barycenter area, values concerning the relationships among .136 | 2.136 | 4.136, the Solar matrix. These relationships now require further study as of the planetary bodies in the solar system. As of these relationships, I suspect that a better comprehension of the planet Pluto, for example, will come into view. At least, that is one of the aspects that will be brought out in following essays.