
Our Price $17.95 Paperback In Stock 
Our Price $19.95 Paperback In Stock 
Our Price $18.95 Paperback In Stock 

The physics paradigm today is based mainly upon the concept of csquare, the squaring of the speed of light in a vacuum. Numerous fundamental physical and chemical constants provided in the physics literature [CODATA] reflect numerical values based upon powers of c, the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined to represent the upper limit of movement of massenergy by physicists. 
The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299792458 meters/second. The square of that number produces a numerical value that does not exist in any form of matterenergy. The csquare actually represents a number that corresponds to a near massless event: a light photon. The author goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein’s famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of Einstein’s formula is explored through basic math, the summation of powers in the equation’s terms. 
A common procedure followed in deriving many of the CODATA recommendations is to divide certain fundamental physical constants by the value of the elementary charge, e, 1.602176487. With regard to the Planck constants and units of measurement, the case is argued that Max Planck may have simply reversed engineered this procedure in order to derive his natural units. 
Read an excerpt of the essay:
Einstein's Formula: A Special Case
c^{3} = c^{1}c^{2} the Baseline of E^{3} = m^{1}c^{2}
Charles William Johnson
©December 2010 Copyrighted.
Earth/matriX: Science Today
ISBN 1586164708
Previously, the relationship c^{9} = c^{7}c^{2} as the basis for Einstein's famous formula: E = mc^{2}, was treated in the Earth/matriX essays. The demonstration is elementary as of the suggested numerical values frequently cited for Einstein's equation. The speed of light in a vacuum (c) to the ninth power is 19560.78711; to the seventh power, it is 2176.431087; and to the square it is 8.987551787. The decimal places may vary in using cms, meters or kilometers, etc.
Aside from this formulation, from the point of view of the stated terms of Einstein's equation, the baseline equation for Einstein's formula relates to that of c^{3} = c^{1}c^{2}. However, before entering the analysis of the terms themselves in this manner, it is first necessary to further examine the basis of c^{9} = c^{7}c^{2} regarding the numerical values of the terms.
Understandably, then, these numerical values correspond to today's values for Planck energy [1.9561], Planck mass [2.17644] and, customarily for the square of the speed of light in vacuo [2.99792458]. By employing these internationally accepted values, the c^{9} = c^{7}c^{2} may substitute the equation E = mc^{2} or, inversely of course.
In this sense, Einstein's formula represents a specific case of equivalencies regarding the speed of light in a vacuum, rather than the general transfer of massenergy as stated throughout the scientific literature.
...
Consider now in detail once again the baseline equation [ c^{3} = c^{2 }c^{1} ] upon which the terms of Einstein's equation rest, in relation to the basic equation [c^{9} =c^{7 }c^{2}] upon which the numerical values of Einstein's formula rest.
c^{3} = c^{2 }c^{1} [ = Einstein's equation for all numbers other than those of mass 2.17644]...
c^{9} = c^{7}c^{2} [= Einstein's equation for Planck mass 2.17644 ]
...
Therefore, in a strict sense, even though the numbers of Einstein's equation when employed classically as 1.9561  2.17644  8.987551787 reflect the equation c^{9} = c^{7}c^{2}, the terms' wordconcepts regarding algebraic notation misleadingly reflect the baseline equation of powers c^{3} = c^{1}c^{2} .
In other words, Einstein's formula as stated, E = mc^{2} , represents and takes for granted
c^{3} = c^{1}c^{2}; given the fact that its terms represent E^{3} = m^{1}c^{2}.
There is no mathematical way to avoid the conclusion that E reflects the summation of powers of mc, as this is understood from the algebraic notation used in the formula.
....
Consequently, it is possible to make the case either way: that Einstein's formula is plagued by confusion and inconsistencies [mixing up terms, powers and numerical values] or, that it is the result of a subsequent conscious mathematical manipulation of its terms and powers. And this situation obtains not necessarily due to Einstein himself, given the fact that he never really forwarded this supposed equation in the form that it exists today. Either way, a serious critical examination of the history of physics for the past 105 years appears to be in order.
===
You may think that with this excerpt you now know how Einstein's formula works, or not. But, this is just the initial analysis. Consider the entire critical reasoning process behind this essay. Read all of the computational steps to get the complete picture of Einstein's famous formula, and possibly some of its shortcomings and problems of basic mathematical design. After you read the Earth/matriX essays about Einstein's formula, you will definitely not be able to view it in the manner as you did prior to reading these critical comments. That which seemed complex before, now actually will appear even simplistic in a certain sense. Follow all of the mathematical steps, purchase the complete analysis now. Start a classroom discussion around these ideas with your teacher's assistance. It was also said that Einstein used highschool math to develop some of his equations. That may be all too true. Check it out.
Our Price $17.95 Paperback In Stock 
Our Price $19.95 Paperback In Stock 
Our Price $18.95 Paperback In Stock 

The physics paradigm today is based mainly upon the concept of csquare, the squaring of the speed of light in a vacuum. Numerous fundamental physical and chemical constants provided in the physics literature [CODATA] reflect numerical values based upon powers of c, the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined to represent the upper limit of movement of massenergy by physicists. 
The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299792458 meters/second. The square of that number produces a numerical value that does not exist in any form of matterenergy. The csquare actually represents a number that corresponds to a near massless event: a light photon. The author goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein’s famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of Einstein’s formula is explored through basic math, the summation of powers in the equation’s terms. 
A common procedure followed in deriving many of the CODATA recommendations is to divide certain fundamental physical constants by the value of the elementary charge, e, 1.602176487. With regard to the Planck constants and units of measurement, the case is argued that Max Planck may have simply reversed engineered this procedure in order to derive his natural units. 
0
Charles William Johnson Earth/matriX: Science Today
P.O. Box 231126, New orleans, Louisiana 701831126, USA
www.earthmatrix.com
johnson@earthmatrix.com
©December 2010 Copyrighted. All rights reserved. reproduction prohibited.
Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion
Fundamental Physical Constants Notes:
Fractal Multiples and Einstein's Equation
Einstein's Formula and Variations of Redundancies