EarthmatriX: Science Today and Science in Ancient Artwork: The Theoretical Interpretation of Spacetime/motion
http://www.earthmatrix.com
Examine the relationships of astronomical
data, mathematical models, the laws of geometry, and how all of that possibly
became interpreted and translated into the ancient artwork and is now relevant to science today.en_USEarthmatriXhttp://www.earthmatrix.com/giflink/logo3.jpg
http://www.earthmatrix.com
15139Misconceptions in the Theory of Relativity: "Traveling Back in Time"
http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/traveling_back_time.htm
All electrogmanetic particle-waves (from radio waves to gamma waves) travel at superluminal velocities along their corresponding particle-wavepath in order to achieve the measured definition distance and speed of light in a vacuum measured along the straight midline.
Superluminal Velocities: Electromagnetic Particle-Waves Always Travel Faster than the Defined Speed of Light in a Vacuum
http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/paths-energy/Electromagnetic-Particle-Waves.pdf
This essay treats some of the theoretical deficiencies in special relativity and the discoveries relating to superluminal velocities of matter-energy.
The Formula in Einstein's Equation
http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/formula_equation.html
The E^2 term predetermines deriving the square root of 382624392.1. But, actually the result on the right side of the equation is in reality the eighteenth power of c, the speed of light in vacuo.
Einstein's Formula and Variations of Redundancies
http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/einstein_formula.html
When mass is employed as numerical value 2.17644, as in Planck mass, the seventh power of c, then the energy term (E), whether squared or not in the equations produces a fractal multiple of Planck energy, 1.9561, the ninth power of the speed of light in a vacuum.
Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion
http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/mass_confusion.html
Continuing with the search powers of c, much to my surprise, c9 is 1.956078711 ---the value that Planck energy is suggesting, 1.9561, only rounded off.
Planck Units of Mass,Momentum and Energy
http://www.earthmatrix-muniments.com/id14.html
Planck mass = c^7, Planck momentum = c^8, Planck energy c^9: c = the speed of light in vacuo.
Fundamental Physical Constants Notes: Fractal Multiples and Einstein's Equation
http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/fractal_multiples.html
The symbolic formula provided in the literature for Planck energy [1.9561] is (Sq rt of hc^5/G), why has a complicated symbolic formula for a matter-energy event been devised when that value may be expressed theoretically as c^9 ?
Einstein's Formula Stands for Powers of Speed of Light, Not the Conversion of Mass|Energy: (c^9 = c^7 c^2 the Basis of E = mc^2)
http://earthmatrix.com/
Charles William Johnson, in his most recent book, Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion [Earth/matriX Editions], shows that Einstein's formula has its origin in the imaginary formula c9 = c7 c2, and does not represent the conversion of mass|energy.
Avogadro's Constant: A Fractal Multiple of Planck Mass or c^7
http://earthmatrix-muniments.com/id15.html
The fact that the numerical values of many fundamental constants represent fractal multiples of powers of the speed of light in a vacuum is not just some mathematical device to derive the symbolic equations/formulae forwarded in the CODATA.
Redefining the Kilogram as of Planck’s Constant: A Critical Commentary.
http://earthmatrix-muniments.com/id5.html
The proposal to employ Planck’s Constant and/or Avogadro’s constant for redefining the kilogram caught my attention immediately. As I have recently written an extensive critique of how the Planck constant appears to be based on contradictory, if not erroneous theoretical computations.
Proposal to Include Planck Implied Values in the CODATA Listing
http://earthmatrix.com/index2.html
I have illustrated how one may derive Planck implied values, that is, numerical values as of the Planck constants. The manner in which the Planck implied values are generated is by multiplying each Planck constant times the elementary charge [1.602176487].
2012 The Potential Impact of Asteroids on Earth
http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/impact_asteroids.html
ooks are beginning to appear now about what the year 2012 may mean, now that other books have lost attention, which cited the years 2002 and 2005 as having been the potentially catastrophic years for the Earth.
Table of Selected Physical and Chemical Constants
http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/tableconstants136.html
Corresponding 1.36+ Fractal Values (24 constants)