<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0">


<channel>
<title>EarthmatriX: Science in Ancient Artwork and Science Today</title>
<link>http://www.earthmatrix.com</link>
<description>Examine the relationships of astronomical 
data, mathematical models, the laws of geometry, and how all of that possibly 
became interpreted and translated into the ancient artwork and is now relevant to science today.</description>
<language>en_US</language> 



<item> 
<title>Scientific Notation, Fractal Numbers and the Symbolic Formulae Based on Roots</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/scientific_notation_symbolic_formulae_fractal_numbers.html</link>
<description>
Two Possible Answers for Some Planck Constants. Illustrations reveal how the symbolic formulae, when square roots and above are employed in the symbolic formulae produce variations for the constant numerical values.Generally, the fundamental physical constants whose symbolic formulae contain roots are said to produce a single correct answer.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Natural Units and Atomic Units</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/natural_units.html</link>
<description>
In summary, in their conversions, the natural/atomic units of momentum, length  and velocity employ the fine structure constant and its inverse expression. While the natural/atomic units of energy and time employ the ratio of the fine structure constant and its inverse expression. And, the natural/atomic units of charge  and mass employ unit 1.0. The question remains whether the computational procedure is valid if based upon distinct conversion factors or relationships.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Compton Wavelength Represents the Fractal Reciprocal of the Planck Implied Length</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/fractal_reciprocal_planck_implied_lenght.html</link>
<description>
In this brief commentary, I illustrate that the Compton wavelength is a reciprocal fractal expression of the Planck implied length value. I also show why the Planck implied time is significant in relation to the natural unit of length as given by the CODATA, which represents a case in favor of its inclusion in the CODATA listing.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Proposal to Include Planck Implied Values in the CODATA Listing</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/proposal_include_planck_implied_codata_values.htm</link>
<description>
The main thrust of my analysis to date has been in relation to the Planck constants of mass, energy, temperature, length and time. In a previous analysis, I have illustrated how one may derive Planck implied values, that is, numerical values as of the Planck constants. The manner in which the Planck implied values are generated is by multiplying each Planck constant times the elementary charge [1.602176487].
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Relationships Regarding Select Fundamental Physical and Chemical Constants</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/physical_and_chemical_constants.html</link>
<description>
In this essay, interrelationships of selected fundamental physical and chemical constants are examined as of the CODATA recommended values, as well as of the implied Earth/matriX values. The propositons regarding the analysis of interrelationships of select physical and chemical constants is presented in the order in which they appear in one of my notebooks. Numerical values are presented in their fractal expression with a floating decimal place. Numerical values vary according to certain computational procedures, but in general the first five significant digits determine the relevancy of the computation.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Errors and Omissions of the CODATA and  the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/planck_units_fundamental_constants_codata_errors.html</link>
<description>
In this brief study, selected CODATA fundamental physical constants are researched in an effort to identify the implied computational foundations that serve as a basis for deriving the Planck constants. The Planck constants are reverse engineered as of the CODATA recommendations. Various Earth/matriX Tables of the Planck Constants illustrate the terms and numerical values that derive each Planck constant listed in the  CODATA.  The derivations are accomplished, not through the CODATA symbolic formulae, but rather based upon the fundamental physical constants.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Earth/matriX Tables of Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/earthmatrix_tables_planck_constants.html</link>
<description>
Table of the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants. Reduced Planck Constants and Their Corresponding Number of Reductions with Earth/matriX Numerical Values for the Planck Constants.  Upon examination of the ten Planck constants it becomes obvious from the computations that every Planck constant studied has been reduced by either the elementary charge, 2-pi or the reciprocal of the speed of light.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The theoretical foundations of the Planck units; Planck mass at 3.4870766395 and reduced Planck mass at 2.17643985835.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/theoretical_foundations_planck_units.html</link>
<description>
Table 1.The Earth/matriX Table of the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants. The theoretical foundations of the Planck units; Planck mass at 3.4870766395 and reduced Planck mass at 2.17643985835. A new numerical value of 6.8208822743077 is proposed for Planck's constant, instead of the traditional CODATA value of 6.62606896, which is thus much closer to Max Planck's original 6.885 assigned value in 1899.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Planck Constants Based on the CODATA Computational Error</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/codata_computational_error_two_different_values_implied_planck.html</link>
<description>
Table 2.- The Planck Constants Based on the CODATA Computational Error of Two Different Values. Implied by the Planck Mass, 3.387040993 | 3.487040993, in Relation to the Fundamental Physical Constants. The table offers an analytical perspective illustrating the anomaly of the 3.387040993 numerical value.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>1.9560844566531 Implied Energy in Relation to other constants.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/fundamental_physical_constants_produce_same_numerical_value_planck.html</link>
<description>
Table 3.- Table of the CODATA Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants: 1.9560844566531 Implied Energy in Relation to other constants. Nine different equations illustrate how different pairs of fundamental physical constants produce the same numerical value for Planck Implied Energy, 1.9560844566531.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Interconnectedness of Spacetime/motion and the Redundancy in the CODATA Fundamental Physical Constants.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/interconnectedness_spacetimemotion_redundancy_codata.html</link>
<description>
Table 4.- Table of the Fundamental Physical Constants: The Interconnectedness of Spacetime/motion and the Redundancy in the CODATA Fundamental Physical Constants. Different CODATA fundamental physical constants have different names, yet they are in fact fractal multiples of one that may be discerned through simple addition and division.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>An example of the term foundations of the CODATA Planck constants and natural units regarding length and time.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/fundamental_physical_constants_natural_unit_length.html</link>
<description>
Table 5.- The Earth/matriX Table of the Planck Constants. An example of the term foundations of the CODATA Planck constants and natural units regarding length and time. Planck length and Planck time are illustrated as of the fundamental physical constants as well as the natural unit of length.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Redundant Derivations of 1.956084466531 Implied Energy in the CODATA Fundamental Physical Constants</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/redundant_derivations_1956084466531_implied_energy.html</link>
<description>
Table 6.- Table of the CODATA Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants: Redundant Derivations of 1.956084466531 Implied Energy in the CODATA Fundamental Physical Constants. Seven different pairs of fundamental physical constants are selected to show how they produce the same numerical value for Planck implied energy.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Reduced Planck Constants and Their Corresponding Number of Reductions with Earth/matriX Numerical Values.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/reductions_earthmatrix_numerical_values_planck_constants.html</link>
<description>
Table 7.- Table of the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants. Reduced Planck Constants and Their Corresponding Number of Reductions with Earth/matriX Numerical Values for the Planck Constants.  Upon examination of the ten Planck constants it becomes obvious from the computations that every Planck constant studied has been reduced by either the elementary charge, 2-pi or the reciprocal of the speed of light.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Two constants have been reduced twice and one has been reduced three times.</title>
</link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/planck%27s_constant_based_3_38704993.html</link>
<description>
Table 8.- Reduced Planck Constants: Planck's Constant, h, Based on 3.387040993. This table essentially repeats Table 7, but with the CODATA numerical values for Planck's constant instead of the Earth/matriX values. Thus, this table illustrates Planck's constant as 6.62606896 as conventionally presented in the CODATA.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Planck Constant and Select Reduced Planck Constants with CODATA values.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckconstant/reduced_planck_constants_with_codata_values.htm</link>
<description>
Table 9.- The Planck Constant and Select Reduced Planck Constants with CODATA values. This table presents the two summarized relationships among the reduced Planck constants, illustrating five of the constants in terms of their number of reductions.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>The Square Root of the Speed of Light in a Vacuum and Planck Units</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckunits/square-root-speed-light.html</link>
<description>
One asks how can a Planck Unit that has the square root of c within its equation produce a single, correct result or constant value. The answer is that mathematically it cannot produce a single answer. Necessarily, it must produce minimally two answers, and the expanded answer would be that an infinite number of results are possible as of the infinite expression of the square root of the fractal value of c.
</description>
</item>

<item> 
<title>Planck Units: Natural Units and the Key Equations in Physics</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/planckunits/planck_unit.pdf</link>
<description>
The author explores the math behind the equations of the Planck Units in order to discern which fractal numerical constants are employed in each one. The author shows that those Planck Units based on square root expressions forward a single constant in their results, when mathematically there exist two variations due to the square root procedure. The deficiency in the Planck Units come from conceptualizing the metric system of a floating decimal as uniform for all equations, when the root variations produce seemingly contradictory fractal numerical results. The results or constants are not contradictory, but merely two options to the same mathematical procedure.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Table of Selected Physical and Chemical Constants</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/tableconstants136.html</link>
<description>
Corresponding 1.36+ Fractal Values (24 constants)
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Inverse Fine-Structure Constant, The Ground State Energy Level of the Electron in a Hydrogen Atom, and, The Earth/matrix Thermodynamic Temperature Scale.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/inverse_fine_structure_constant.html</link>
<description>
The relationships between some of the physical and chemical constants revolving within the 1.36 - 1.37 fractal range are treated in this essay. The ground state energy level of the electron in a Hydrogen atom shares a similar fractal value to the ratio of the boiling/freezing points of water on the thermodynamic temperature scale. The theoretical equation or formula of the inverse fine-structure constant presents an algebraic expression based on a redundancy of terms, which is critically analyzed and illustrated with a more economical expression.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Earth's Life Cycles Contradict the Supercontinent Cycle.(Pangaea, Pangaea Ultima)
The Earth's Reproductive Life Cycles of Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen and Water Deny the Theory of Continental Drift.</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/earth_life_cycles.pdf</link>
<description>
The theorists of continental drift created the idea of a supercontinent cycle, Pangaea - Pangaea Ultima, while they appear to have overlooked the effects of that cycle upon the Earth's reproductive life cycles of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and water.  In this essay, the author analyzes how and why the life cycles of Earth contradict the ideas proposed in the supercontinent cycle forwarded by the continental drift theorists.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Potential Impact of Asteroids on Earth</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/impact_asteroids.html</link>
<description>
One can only wonder whether the ancients had any inside information about the movements of the asteroids in our solar system.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hawking&apos;s A Brief History of Time, A Commentary</title>
<link>http://earthmatrix.com/hawking/introduction.htm</link>
<description>
By analyzing the use of word-cocnepts in Hawking`s own analysis, we should be able to better understand the theoretical construct that he is employing, or suggesting.
</description>
</item>
</channel>