 The Aztec Calendar: The Inner Rings A Possible
Method of Calculation; Science in Ancient Artwork Nš10, New
Orleans, 30 March 1995, 17pp.
The 260 daycount calendar reflects a 146 year cycle, which forms
a reckoning system equivalent to the 104 yearcycle of the 365 daycount,
and to the yearcycle of the 584 daycount.
Extract:
The peoples of ancient Mesoamerica were concerned with counting the
cycles of time. To think, however, that the Aztec Calendar's intricacy
in design might represent a mere reckoning of the days would appear
rather simplistic; too much meets the eye to be reduced to merely
counting the number of days in a year. Most interpretations, however,
treat the numbers of day represented in the calendar, concluding generally
that the Aztec Calendar reflects the 260c and the 365c calendars.
In this analysis, we shall consider the logic of the Aztec Calendar's
elements, their number and design with respect to the reckoning of
the years and cycles, or calendar rounds. We shall not consider only
the mexica system, but also the maya system which appears to have
had enormous influence then. We shall examine the inner rings, reserving
the analysis of the outer ring, the Ring of Serpents for a later essay.
 Cosmic Time: The 260c Calendar; Science in Ancient
Artwork Nš11, New Orleans, 6 April 1995, 10pp.
The yearly cycle numbers of the ancient Mesoamerica reckoning system
are projected on to an analysis of the inner rings of the Aztec Calendar.
Extract:
In our examination of the reckoning systems of ancient Mesoamerica,
we are attempting to comprehend the way in which the significant cycle
numbers may be related. There does appear to exist a particular mathematical
logic behind the numbers.
One possible relationship may be discerned among the 65year cycle
of the Venus 584 daycount; the 52year cycle of Earth's 365 daycount;
and a 73year cycle of the ancient 260 daycount. As we have seen
in previous studies (Earth/matriX nš8), by comparing the 365c and
the 584c, intervals occur at every 260year period on the Venus table.
which coincide with intervals the distinct daycounts coincide in
numbers of days, and thereby whole cycles may be counted for the orbits
of Earth and Venus.
In that previous essay, we suggested that the 260ccalendar may have
been derived mathematically from this 260year interval pattern. The
260c could then have served as a method of calculation for whole cycles
between the 365c and the 584c. It was further suggested that this
possible mathematical origin to the 260c may have also been related
to the Great Sun Cycle of 26,000 years, where by it is also obvious
that 260 represents a fractal of 26,000.
Let us further examine, then, the nature of the 260 calendar as of
the implications of the distinct cycles and their corresponding daycount.
Let us explore how the cycle numbers 52, 65 and 73 relate in distinct
manners to the 365, 584 and 260 daycounts.
 Numbers in Ancient Mesoamerica: Duplatio and Mediatio;
Science in Ancient Artwork Nš12, New Orleans, 24 April 1995, 16pp.
The Dresden Codex numbers (236/90/250/8) represent day/year counts
and constant numbers for a method of astronomical computation.
Extract:
Little is known about the way in which the ancient astronomers achieved
their calculations for whole cycles of the orbits of the planetary
bodies in the solar system. In this series of essays, we have suggested
different methods of calculation regarding examples of ancient artwork
in Mesoamerica. One author (Harleston) emphasizes the point that,
in fact, the ancient astronomers were not creating art as such, but
rather working out cosmic knowledge. In a sense, that is why we have
draw attention to the concept of science in this series of essays
on ancient artwork.
Exactly how they achieved their science seems to have been long lost
throughout history. Let us attempt to reconstruct a possible insight
into the method of calculation regarding ancient reckoning systems
in Mesoamerica. In order develop this, we begin by considering that
the numbers themselves reflect a specific design,. The logic of the
numbers, of the daycounts, the yearcounts, the calendar rounds,
and the cycle numbers may reveal the manner in which they were obtained.
 The Aztec Calendar: The Ring of Flames; Science
in Ancient Artwork Nš13, New Orleans, 30 April 1995, 12pp.
The Ring of Flames of the Aztec Calendar reflects the daycounts
of 365 and 584, and related to the design of the spatial allotment
thereof.
Extract:
This essay treats a possible method of calculation regarding the
Ring of Flames of the Aztec Calendar, and the relationship there of
with the precession of the equinoxes. The 52year cycle of the 365
daycount reckoning system is analyzed with respect to the spatial
division of the design of the Aztec Calendar. The relationship of
the 365c reckoning system and the Sun's Great Cycle (ca. 26000 years)
is shown to be the result of design, and not a mere coincidence of
numbers. A discussion and interpretation of the dayglyph numbers
13, acatl, examine its possible relation to the precession of the
equinoxes.
 The Aztec Calendar: The Ring of Serpents; Earth/matriX,
Science in Ancient Artwork Nš14, New Orleans, 14 May 1995, 12pp.
The concept of the underworld, mictlan, is discussed regarding the
Aztec Calendar and the daycount for Earth and Venus.
Extract:
The space allotment and the placement of specific elements within
the Aztec Calendar are not apparently due to mere artistic expression.
Rather, they reflect science, knowledge within astronomy, mathematics,
and geometry; as well as creative art.
The complexity of design and the depth of knowledge become quite
apparent in the Ring of serpents (xiuhcoatls). The outermost ring
of the Aztec Calendar etched upon its face, the Ring of Serpents,
reflects the same method of employing symbols and apparently constant
numbered elements. As we have analyzed in previous essays, each concentric
ring entails a specific amount of constant elements to which particular
valences may be assigned.
 The Legend of the Four Suns; Science in Ancient
Artwork Nš15, New Orleans, 21 May 1995, 10pp.
The legend of the "Four Suns" is discussed in terms of the 52c cycle
and the Dresden codex numbers.
Extract:
The legend of the four suns, followed by the fifth sun, is most undoubtedly
a reflection of ancient belief, and possibly founded in history. To
what extent, however, do the numbers of the versions of the codices
and tradition reflect a faithful representation of the original legend
may never be known. The 676pattern is cited in this version as having
been annotated in 1558; 37 years after the conquest of Mexico.
A side from the obvious relationship of constant numbers (multiples
of 4s, 10s etc.), and cycle numbers (52, 65, 73, etc.) in the dates
and periods cited for the four suns, might there not be another aspect
assigned to these numbers as having specific significance.
One could also see these numbers as enshrouding an identification
of specific numbers that were significant then, in postconquest Mexico.
 The Maya Long Count and the Sidereal Orbit of Venus;
Science in Ancient Artwork Nš16, New Orleans, May 1995, 11pp.
The maya Long Count is shown to be a function of the sidereal orbit
of Venus.
Extract:
This essay forms part of a series in which I attempt to discern how
the computations of whole cycles within the different reckoning systems
of ancient Mesoamerica may have been effected. The historically significant
daycounts and their corresponding cycle numbers, of the maya and
mexica cultures, reveal an apparent logic of numbers grounded upon
the relation of the synodic orbit of Venus and the solar year of Earth.
To date many astronomers belive that the ancient maya people did
not even conceive of the Universe as planetary bodies that orbited
one another. The fact that calculations were based upon the apparent
orbit of Venus, its synodic orbit, would seem to prove such an idea.
For the synodic orbit is the time reckoned from the perspective of
the observer on Earth watching Venus move in the sky. However, if
the maya long count system, based on the 360 daycount would reflect
the sidereal orbit, then that might suggest that the ancient maya,
in fact, knew of the sidereal orbit of Venus.
Such a recognition on the part of the maya would further suggest
that they understood the nature of the solar system, and calculated
the actual physical orbiting of the Sun by Venus; a feat which is
not restricted to the perspective upon Earth. Human reasoning and
analysis could have led them to design such a system of reckoning.
In this essay, I attempt to demonstrate the manner in which the maya
long count (360c) relates to the sidereal orbit of Venus, if considered
to represent 225 days. The relation 225:360 is mathematically the
same as that of 365:584. In other words, both the sidereal and synodic
orbits of Venus relate to Earth's approximate solar year by a ratio
of .625 exactly. If this were the case, then their having designed
a system based on the 360 day/count was surely and precisely by design;
not in error. The maya knew that the Earth's solar year was 365 days/years;
that is why they chose the figure 360 for the sidereal count of Venus
computations.
 The Reckoning Systems of Ancient Mesoamerica:
The Synodic and the Sidereal Orbits of Venus; Science in Ancient
Artwork Nš17, New Orleans, May 1995, 14pp.
The constant and cycle numbers of the 260 daycounts are discussed.
Extract:
In this essay, then we shall examine the tables of constant numbers
and a possible relationship of the 360 daycount (360c) reckoning
system with the synodic (584c) and the sidereal (225c) orbits of the
planet Venus. We should emphasize once again, as in previous essays,
that the daycounts corresponding to the planet Venus are those used
by the ancient astronomers, given the fact that the actual orbit of
Venus varies by a couple days each year; where by the average orbital
time is cited today as being 583.92 days.
The ancient astronomers were evidently interested in calculating
whole cycles, the comparison of orbital times among the planetary
bodies in the solar system in terms of whole number. Such an intention
would immediately reflect the fact that they knew the orbital times
occurred in numerical fractions, which they could allow to remain
or eliminate in a knowledgeable fashion.
 The Reckoning Systems of Ancient Mesoamerica: DayCount
and Constant Numbers; Science in Ancient Artwork Nš18, New Orleans,
May 1995, 11pp.
The daycounts and the constant numbers of the reckoning system of
ancient Mesoamerica are analyzed regarding the logic of numbers.
Extract:
The significant numbers of the reckoning systems of ancient Mesoamerica
consist of day/year count numbers, cycle numbers, and constants. These
numbers appear to from a logically structured system, which serve
as the basic for the different reckoning systems of ancient Mesoamerica.
The day/year counts that reflect the orbital times of the planetary
bodies are accompanied by cycle counts, which may also represent day/years
counts. For example, the 365 daycount (365c) and the 584 daycount
(584c) of Earth and Venus respectively, are accompanied by the cycle
counts of the 52 and 65, or 104 and 65, again respectively. These
cyclecount numbers may also represent day or years themselves in
the method of calculation devised by the ancient astronomers.
 The Method of Calculation of the Reckoning System
of Ancient Mesoamerica; Science in Ancient Artwork Nš19, New
Orleans, 30 May 1995, 11pp.
The method of astronomical computation is explained as orbital times.
